I know you think you're a clever lad with your logic and all, but claiming it's not about morals, just logical cause and effect, is pretty disingenuous. Yes, we all know that walking alone in a high crime area flashing cash is dumb. Yes, we could even all agree that getting falling-down drunk at a frat party is unwise. There are all kinds of foolish things people do to put themselves in harm's way, and sometimes it's worthwhile to produce PSA's saying, "Hey, you probably shouldn't do this."

But given that my original post was specifically about (among other things) rape and sexual harassment, and you went straight for the very analogy I was talking about, I am finding your wounded indignation that people are reading implications about moral culpability and sexual assault into your statements when that's totally not what you were talking about at all even a little bit to be highly suspect.