Is homosexuality inherently more sexual than heterosexuality? I never implied that. But disagree with absolute statements regarding the role of the lack of romance in the HP series. JKR created a space in which to explore values often overshadowed by sex. The Weasleys are a good example of a fiercely loyal family that then needs to grapple with Percy rising at the wrong time through the ministry and being oblivious to its moral failings. But JKR went further, depicting marriage as a covenant, totally deemphasizing the role of exploring sexuality, of love while it lasts, which is how she can come to a situation where high school sweethearts stay together.
You may not find it realistic, but there really are segments of society where the sexuality of the HP series is totally the reality. I know such places. While it may not be for everyone, it allows for questioning some current values, which is something literature lends itself to.
Oh, and why I don't think the gay aspect belongs in this story? Max and Martin made total sense to me as fiercely loyal, ambitious friends, without regard to sexuality. By making them gay, we become unable to explore non-sexual friendship between males. And given how unimportant it still is for this story, yes, it feels like a take that Jo job.
no subject
You may not find it realistic, but there really are segments of society where the sexuality of the HP series is totally the reality. I know such places. While it may not be for everyone, it allows for questioning some current values, which is something literature lends itself to.
Oh, and why I don't think the gay aspect belongs in this story? Max and Martin made total sense to me as fiercely loyal, ambitious friends, without regard to sexuality. By making them gay, we become unable to explore non-sexual friendship between males. And given how unimportant it still is for this story, yes, it feels like a take that Jo job.
--Geneva