A huge problem I have is it because it's all SO HEATED, I have no idea where to take her concerns seriously and when she's just being snarky. It's all sounds the same to me. If she's just venting, great. But it's hard to take venting as anything profound.
Hmmm. This'll sound stupid, but I do think the difference becomes clear after you get used to her writing style. In general, the content of her criticisms is supposed to be taken seriously while the rhetoric is supposed to be enjoyed for its own sake. I will admit the style is not for everyone, but hey, nobody said you had to like it. :p But some people (not you) seem to be saying more than "I personally do not enjoy ACM's writing style," but rather something more like "What ACM is doing is wrong and she should stop," which I honestly find kind of weird.
no subject
Hmmm. This'll sound stupid, but I do think the difference becomes clear after you get used to her writing style. In general, the content of her criticisms is supposed to be taken seriously while the rhetoric is supposed to be enjoyed for its own sake. I will admit the style is not for everyone, but hey, nobody said you had to like it. :p But some people (not you) seem to be saying more than "I personally do not enjoy ACM's writing style," but rather something more like "What ACM is doing is wrong and she should stop," which I honestly find kind of weird.