Date: 2012-09-11 03:59 am (UTC)
Hmm. I might would agree that it's natural in the sense that children end up learning it anyway because their interactions with others force them to. If a child wrongs someone else, that someone else is going to snap back somehow, which will cause the child to try to understand why.

But I can't really agree that it's hardwired into our brains. How do you explain spoilt children then? I think it's widely accepted that if you protect a child from the consequences of their actions too fanatically, you end up with a vicious and completely self-centered brat.

As for sociopathy broadly being a mental disability, I couldn't disagree more. I wrote quite a long paragraph on this before I realized it was going to branch us way off-topic. Suffice to say, I consider complete amorality to be perfectly viable in a person. I wouldn't live that way myself, but I can see the benefits and the downsides. I consider it more viable than perfect morality as well. The negative attitude towards sociopaths, psycopaths, or whatever you want to call an amoral person is just a reaction by society towards a state of mind that is a threat to them. It's bad for us as a group, therefore we don't like it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

inverarity: (Default)
inverarity

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678 910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 07:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios