Inverarity is not a Scottish village

I don't think of Law and Chaos as being about what the character thinks of the current status quo so much as the person's opinion on whether order or freedom is preferable in principle. A lawful good and chaotic good person would both oppose an evil government but would differ on what to replace it with. Lilith Grimm is Lawful good because she is good (self-sacrificing, actively works to protect others) but also a strict disciplinarian who believes that that the best way to protect others is through a strictly enforced code of rules. Alexandra is Chaotic Good because she has the same self-sacrifice and moral compass but believes in following her own principles and neither submits to others authority nor tries to impose her own rules upon others. Abraham Thorn is Lawful Neutral (Or Lawful Evil). Abraham is trying to to bring down the status quo (though he preferred to work within the system to change it and only took the sword when he was forced to), and his ruthless methods disqualify him for a Good alignment, but by his own admission he is doing this in order to replace it with a better system. He would prefer to rule in this system but it's the system that matters and he would be willing to let someone else rule. Diana Grimm is also Lawful Neutral (Or maybe Lawful Evil), though from the perspective of someone who either believes in the system or thinks that it's bad but preferable to chaos. Chaotic Evil is John Manuelito. He does whatever he pleases, and in his view this is the only course that makes sense because he sees both ethics and morals as pointless.