Date: 2011-02-01 11:27 pm (UTC)
Your reviews show, as a rule, sound judgment and a pleasing ability to convey your emotions and make us sympathize with them. You are an excellent reviewer - and I have read a few. However, as your experience seems largely to do with the last few decades, there are times when you fall into anachronism. You read that Dickens and Trollope wrote for popular magazines; you read that they had great and widespread success; and you imagine that, being "popular" writers, they lacked that "literary" prestige that only time was to bestow on them. But you are ascribing to Dickens and Trollope a distinction that simply did not exist in their time. (http://fpb.livejournal.com/103829.html) The very notion of popular art as opposed to highbrow or serious art simply did not exist in Dickens' formative years; and while it is true that a few canting idiots had begun to castigate his popular success by the time he died, nobody of any importance treated him as anything but a living genius and a great master while he was alive. Sydney Smith, Macaulay, Matthew Arnold - none of whom agreed with his views - all admired him wildly. He made his way to the head of society by the sheer force of his genius; and when he took it on himself to criticize an institution - like, for instance, the Court of Chancery in Bleak House - that institution felt it had to defend himself. He was, that is, both a pop star and a recognized intellectual and moral authority. And the magazines for which he wrote - when he did not publish them himself, since he had a long career as journalist and editor - were not "popular" in any sense we would recognize. I have a bound copy of a year's issues of one - the year being that great and awful year 1860 - and what can clearly be seen is that the publisher aimed to present everything that was most significant about contemporary events and culture. One page might have a poem by Elizabeth BArrett; the next a news report from Garibaldi's invasion of Sicily or from the American electoral campaign; another, yes, a chapter from the latest novel of Trollope or Thackeray. This is not USA TODAY or SPORTS ILLUSTRATED we are talking about; it is more like Norman Mailer or Truman Capote publishing a short story on PLAYBOY magazine, minus the porn, of course.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

inverarity: (Default)
inverarity

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678 910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 01:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios