Page Summary
tealterror0.livejournal.com - Talkity talk talk
uneko.livejournal.com - (no subject)
anyareine.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shinygobonkers.livejournal.com - (no subject)
klaelman23.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rheymus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
kerneyhead.livejournal.com - (no subject)
graeme sutton - Shipping/Ending
Style Credit
- Style: Scarlet for Modish by
- Resources: Stock.XCHNG
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Talkity talk talk
Date: 2012-06-07 06:20 pm (UTC)1. Shipping
Okay, so despite previously being one of the most vocal Alex/Anna shippers here...I actually chose "someone else." I apologize for my betrayal, but I really don't ship them anymore. And I think it's because their relationship is just too unequal and always will be.
I like Anna, a lot. But when it comes to Alex, she's a follower. The only time she wasn't a follower was that one time in Deathly Regiment she chewed Alex out for being a crappy friend. On reflection, I actually think their relationship had a chance to be more equal after that--until Anna told the Confederation Alex was meeting with Abraham, which totally reversed that development and made Anna into more of a follower than ever. She showed no sign of growing out of that in Book 4; she developed some Deadpan Snarker tendencies, true, but she still basically did everything Alex wanted her to do without question.
So to pull my vague thoughts together: I think if they got together it'd be cute. But at this point I don't think they'll ever grow out of this messed-up power dynamic. So a romantic relationship would end up being really unhealthy for the both of them IMO. They work much better as friends.
Who am I shipping Alex with, you ask? Well, for guys it's Johnny, who ended up being really awesome (seriously, he took on Dark Wizards with rocks and won). For girls...
...Angelique. I know, I feel bad about it, and it started off as a joke, but I kind of really want to see it now! I don't even know why! *buries head in hands*
2. Favorite/Least Favorite Book
I spent way too much time thinking about this, especially since it didn't really matter.
First, a disclaimer: Since I was a beta reader for book 4 (and only for book 4), I experienced that book in a much different way than the others. Not only in terms of being able to control when I read the chapters and seeing them in an unfinished state (though both are important), but in order to give effective comments I had to read the chapters with a much more critical eye than I did the other books. Therefore, I'm probably judging book 4 more harshly than it really deserves.
That said, my order of favorites is probably:
1. Deathly Regiment
2. (tied) Lands Below; Stars Above
4. Thorn Circle
Deathly Regiment has some problems with pacing (nothing really happens in chapters 10-14) and having too many subplots. But it has a strong plot, Alex trying to resurrect Max, almost from the beginning to the end. Both Alex and Anna go through a lot of character development, and a lot of emotionally compelling events happen. And the Deathly Regiment revelation is inspired.
Lands Below and Stars Above are really close in quality level. The odd thing is they shouldn't be; overall, I think Stars Above is actually much better-written. But the climax of Lands Below is much better--the climax of Stars Above is probably the worst of all the books. Let me explain...in the next post! Yeah, I'm nowhere near done.
Re: Talkity talk talk
Date: 2012-06-07 06:22 pm (UTC)I don't necessarily have an issue with shipping and foreshadowing. I have an issue when they take up the entire last third of a book. When the chapters before the climax don't directly contribute to the climax, it's a problem. Oh, and the climax itself? I like the Nemesis Spirit and John Manuelito as antagonists, but it's hard to deny it's a far less epic confrontation than in any of the other books. Probably because it all takes place in one small room in a basement.
Compare that to Lands Below, which probably has the best climax out of all the books, for reasons that should be obvious. My major issues with Lands Below are that its antagonists (Darla, John Manuelito, and the Generous Ones) are rather uncompelling, and it basically has two different main plots (Mors Mortis Society and Lands Below) with little to do with each other.
Honestly, I would've ranked Stars Above as #3 were it not for the last chapter, which was amazing and went a fair distance to make up for the issues with the climax. Not all the way, but a fair amount.
As for Thorn Circle? Well, it was Inverarity's first book and wasn't beta'd so we can cut it some slack. I actually think it has the best pacing and strongest antagonist out of all of them, and it's certainly not a bad book. But it's the worst-written, and some obvious places where a beta would've helped (a lot of irrelevant scenes, some Mary Sue stuff for Alex, etc). And the plot is probably the least interesting out of all of them, though that actually doesn't bother me as much as it might.
3. Ending
I really wanted a "Bittersweet" option, but while you use that word you also have "Tragic" before it, and I'm not expecting a tragic ending. So I chose "Mostly happy, some tears," even though what I really expect is "Half happy, half tears," to be glib.
For the most part, endings should be of the same tone as the rest of the story; a sad ending to happy series or a happy ending to a sad series will feel like an Ass Pull and will tend to (rightfully) get people pissed off at you. So while the question is "What kind of ending are you expecting?", what it's really asking is "What kind of tone does the Alexandra Quick series have?"
Inverarity has talked several times about how his series is "darker," or more tragic, than the Harry Potter one, and it is. But it's not that much darker. Basically, it has more deaths and a more cynical worldview, but that's about it.
There are other aspects that seem like they're darker. Like the government ritually sacrificing children, and racism, and the terrorist Abraham Thorn is somewhat sympathetic, and stuff. But these make it edgier, not more tragic. To explain why, I'll just copy from Dan Hemmens:
Secondly, horrors of actual, non-school-based wars aside, "like the real world but nastier" is yet another way of saying "like the real world but better".
None of the things I listed above make the series more tragic because none of them impact the characters we care about. To put it baldly, they're basically window-dressing. This doesn't make them bad--edgy window dressing is not necessarily any worse than happy window dressing--but they don't impact the "tragicness" of the series. Alex having to deal with people who sacrifice children is not necessarily any more tragic than Alex having to deal with Larry the school bully.
So when you ignore the window dressing and look at the core: both bad stuff and good stuff happens to Alex, and while she does really go through the ringer, each book ends with a generally positive outlook. So I don't expect Alex to fully succeed in her goals and I expect at least one of her friends to die, but it's going to end on a happy note because, despite everything, the series really is on balance optimistic.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-07 07:31 pm (UTC)Though secondarily, Alex and Brian would be cute together one day <3 <3 but right NOW, Brian doesn't have enough play in the series. --at current state, I could see her ending being heading back to Larkin Mills after a long battle and Brian being kind to her.. and... kind of a blooming hope sort of thing before the cover of the last book closed... but he also would make a good 'sacrifice' to the book gods... a character who the audience and main character cares about, but the audience is not deeply emotionally tied into.
Anyway, I picked deathly or lands for favorite, I think. Don't quite remember. Stars didn't get my winning vote simply because I didn't enjoy the pacing at the end so much. all of the stuff out in the desert was exciting and thrilling.... then she came home, was paranoid for a while (which I loved) and then suddenly, plot climax out of left field. I was kinda left going "wait, it's over?" which removed some of the fun for me from the book. Plus, I loved Max <3 The difference might be the difference between a complete book I read over a few days sitting, and a book I started reading 'in progress' and had to wait for several weeks to see the conclusions of. WHile the later is of course VERY exciting, it's a lot harder to become fully invested in a story that way..... I maybe have to go reread in a little bit. :D
for least fave I think I chose thorn circle, but I wonder if I should take that back... thorn circle as a lot of fun for me also because it was the first step. it had all of the magic in it. just like the first few chapters of harry potter, Alexandra at he pond, with the kappa, learning the ins and out of magical school was thrilling. I LOVE the 'discovery' in such stories. Hearkens back, I expect, to my increasingly dwindling hope that an owl will knock on my window some day and go "hi! I know you're nearly 30, but COME TO our MAGIC school and learn how special you REALLY are!" :)
as for endings... well, it does depend on how things keep going. The one difference between Alexandra and Harry is that Harry had Voldemort. a very clear and simple enemy. Alex... does not have an enemy with a face. She fights against the very nature of fate itself, it seems. (there are bad guys with faces, but none of them are "Voldemort") ... thus, i'ts hard to get a feeling for how things 'will' end... So, I think I default to the idea that this is not a story where everyone is doomed. This is not a story where everyone except alex/anna/whatever dies. I COULD see it being a story where Alex dies.... but I don't think so. will someone die? very possibly. Will people be hurt? possibly disfigured? Oh, yes. I think that very much as a possibility. ... but I think the over all tone of the ending will be "we won!" .. but not happily ever after. :C I dunno, I'm rambling :)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-07 08:51 pm (UTC)That was me! I commented that! :D Validation!
Seriously, though. What you described is exactly what I meant by her being a follower. She's a good follower, no doubt...but still a follower.
Anna's a great friend for Alex, don't get me wrong. But IMO, a romantic relationship shouldn't involve one person being a "leader" and the other person putting herself in a position to be asked for help, should the leader find it convenient to do so.
Like, at the end of Deathly Regiment, where Alex basically goes all JROC and literally gives orders to Anna. (She does something similar when they confront Mary at the 1/3 point of Stars Above.) That kind of thing is disturbing enough when they're friends; if they start dating and Alex still orders her around, it's even worse.
All that said, I wouldn't put it past Inverarity to have them start dating, and it would probably make for an interesting storyline. But I think of "shipping" as wanting people to get together and stay together, not temporarily hook up, and in that sense I can't honestly say I ship Alex and Anna anymore. :(
no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 10:07 am (UTC)Yeah.. It's not so much that she's a leader00she is, but it's more that she's thoughtless. SHe's getting better, but isn't there yet XD
no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 08:17 pm (UTC)The balance of 'power' has been evening out, as ALex becomes more mature, and as Anna learns to step up a bit and be more independant herself then what she had been at the very beginning of the series.
Besides. Alex doesn't ALWAYS order anna around. It's only in tight tense situations where there's not a whole lot of room or time to debate (I believe they DO debate when there IS time) and where the two of them fighting it out would be bad. Most relationships--friend and otherwise--tend to have a 'leader' anyway... just like my husband and I. he 'leads' for financial matters, I control around-the-house matters like laundry and dishes, He deals with the 'outside' stuff, computer hardware, etc, I deal with finding other assorted types of information and the wrangling of our pets. I don't see Alex and Anna as so different. Only instead of the matter of who cooks dinner, Alex deals in the 'off the cuff life and death' things, and anna doesn't. Anna takes part in the planning of things, plotting and working things out ahead of time. Anna is the one who'd sit there and say "Alexandra, you are sick. You are going to go have a bowl of soup, then get at least 2 hours of sleep. THEN you can resume your planning." Right now, it isn't an equal share of power, no, but I see that changing--compare still to the first book or two where Alex crashed through, looked back over her shoulder at the mess she'd left and yelled back "Sorry!"
Give them time <3
no subject
Date: 2012-06-09 01:07 am (UTC)I'm not saying it was immoral for Alex to order Anna around. Given the situation, it was fair enough. But IMO, in a healthy relationship there'd be no need for orders; requests would be enough.
As for the power dynamic issues...well, I think partly we're just coming from different life experiences. A lot of my relationships--maybe even most--don't really have a 'leader.' I've never been married so I can't speak to that. But I don't think the Alex/Anna relationship even has the "different spheres of authority" thing you talk about. Alex is basically in charge everywhere.
Now, maybe you're right that in time, their personalities will change to the extent that a romantic relationship would be healthier. Undoubtedly they are much different than how they were in Book 1. But as they are now, I just can't ship them. :/ Want them to hook up for a time, yes--I think that would be interesting--but stay together forever, no.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-09 01:12 am (UTC)Do you think this would be different with any partner Alex might wind up with? ;)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-09 01:34 am (UTC)(And yes, I'm aware your post was mostly a joke, lol.)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-07 08:02 pm (UTC)Favourite is The Lands Below.
Least would be Thorn Circle, but I actually do like it. Just the least out of them all.
And Robots!
Yeah, mostly.
Date: 2012-06-08 04:42 am (UTC)Well, I DID, until he got his fingers bitten off by a dark creature. Now, Fingerless!Larry/Alex doesn't really intrigue me much anymore :/
I liked Stars Above a lot, but it's also the only one I haven't reread. I reread all the others. Several times, even during publication. To be fair, SA was so filled with astonishing revelations that the slower parts seemed almost dead by comparison. It left SA feeling less climactic, even though the plot climaxes were some of the most far-reaching of the series. I felt like there should have been more energy in the last 4 or 5 chapters; I just didn't feel it.
~DarkSov
Re: Yeah, mostly.
Date: 2012-06-08 06:33 pm (UTC)Re: Yeah, mostly.
Date: 2012-06-09 04:50 am (UTC)They're both very driven and talented, if arrogant and impulsive. I think they'd be great challenges for each other. That could be good or bad...they'd either end up pushing each other toward greatness, or killing each other. In any case, it would be passionate.
Re: Yeah, mostly.
Date: 2013-10-13 10:01 pm (UTC)Yes, yes we are other Larry.
DANGER ZONE!
no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 01:39 am (UTC)safe/stress-free travels :]
no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-08 06:06 pm (UTC)The Circle of Protection
Date: 2012-06-08 06:49 pm (UTC)Basically, John had incomplete information (just as Journey did). Alexandra speculated that the reason John (or who she thought was John) didn't attack her directly was fear of the Circle of Protection. But maybe she was wrong and John didn't know about it. Or maybe he didn't believe in it. Or he was really clever and well-informed and had figured out that Journey had already triggered it. Or he'd been watching other people harass and try to kill Alexandra, and figured that if she still had a Circle of Protection, it should have been triggered by one of her other enemies.
Any of those work for you? If not, I can give you the real reason.
(I'm lying. I won't give you the real reason. But there are clues. :P)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-09 08:26 pm (UTC)Geming said Alex/Anna friendship was a good thing because Anna needs to be more troublesome and Alex needs to be less troublesome. But it hain't happened. The Story needs troublesome students, because obedient students hain't a story. If Alex/Anna balanced each other, then there would still be enough troublesome to drive the story.
Stars Above, Alex was TOO brattish. Ifn I had been Grimm, I would have expelled Alex in chapter 1.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-09 11:00 pm (UTC)What, you mean after she saved her sister's life?
no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 09:07 am (UTC)Just common sense, really.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-10 04:12 am (UTC)As for books, my Fav/Least Fav are Stars Above And Thorn Circle respectively.
I think Stars Above had the fastest pace and the most energy, and while I certainly liked Thorn Circle, it seemed to be mirroring the plot of Philosophers Stone a bit too much.
As for the ending, I'm expecting something between Bittersweet Ending and Earn Your Happy Ending.
Finally, can I just say how hilarious it is that people seem to think that GIANT ROBOT BATTLES!!! seems MORE likely than Rocks Fall Everyone dies.
Alex: ALEX TRANSFORM TO: SUPER GIGA MECHA ALEX!!
Dean Grimm: (*Has an Aneurysm*)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 04:20 am (UTC)I've also always loved the idea of a happy Muggle/Witch pairing.
So yes, my choices are all about my personal passions.
Favorite Book: Deathly Regiment
Least Favorite: Thorn Circle
Shipping/Ending
Date: 2013-08-31 02:56 am (UTC)Anyway, on the subject of shipping, I favor Larry for three main reasons.
1. He is one of my favorite characters in the story and represents one of my favorite archtypes.
2. He's roughly equal with Alex in power and is one of the few who doesn't take shit from her.
3. Alexandra's personality seems like it would be really well-suited to a dark, angry, destructive romance (I'm picturing something like Spike/Buffy but with less annoying double standards) and that's more or less what I picture a Larry/Alex pairing as.
As for the ending none of the categories really fit my preference, but the closest would probably be EPIC GIANT ROBOTS BATTLE! Ever since I realized that a) Abraham Thorn has a wide array of similarities with Julius Caesar and b) Alexandra shares names with Alexander the Great and Gaius Octavian I've been kind of hoping for a fantastic retelling of the end of the Roman Republic, concluding with Alexandra proclaiming herself Consul-for-Life and First Citizen of the new American Empire from atop a throne built from Generous One Bones (If this is not what is going to happen, there is no need to dissuade me from my Happy fantasies). Maybe Medea could play the role of Mark Antony. As for what I acually expect to happen, Alexandra's death has been so heavily foreshadowed that I actually am expecting the story to end with the death of the hero (for realsies, not a cop-out like Deathly Hallows)