inverarity: (inverarity)
[personal profile] inverarity
Cinderella, Snow White, and Sleeping Beauty as Charlie's Angels — it's actually not as dumb as it sounds.


The Stepsister Scheme

Daw, 2009, 344 pages



You know how all those old fairy tales take you through lots of scary adventures till you finally reach that inevitable line: "And they lived happily ever after..." Guess what? It's not true. Life in never-never land isn't all sweetness and light. Cinderella - whose real name is Danielle Whiteshore (nee Danielle de Glas) - does marry Prince Armand. And (if you can ignore the pigeon incident) their wedding is a dream-come-true.

But not long after the "happily ever after," Danielle is attacked by her stepsister Charlotte, who suddenly has all sorts of magic to call upon. And though Talia - otherwise known as Sleeping Beauty - comes to the rescue (she's a martial arts master, and all those fairy blessings make her almost unbeatable), Charlotte gets away.

That's when Danielle discovers a number of disturbing facts: Armand has been kidnapped and taken to the realm of the Fairies; Danielle is pregnant with his child; and the Queen has her very own Secret Service that consists of Talia and Snow (White, of course). Snow is an expert at mirror magic and heavy-duty flirting.

Can three princesses track down Armand and extract both the prince and themselves from the clutches of some of fantasyland's most nefarious villains?




Snow White is the magic user, Sleeping Beauty is the fighter/thief, and Cinderella is the 0-level bard or something.

To be honest, yet another redone fairy tale did not interest me that much, and I only read this book because I read [livejournal.com profile] jimhines's blog. I like the guy, so I was curious to see if his writing was any good. Hey, guess what — it is!

In fact, I realized that the essential silliness of the premise and the cover was turning me off of what otherwise is just the sort of light fantasy I used to (and still do) enjoy.

The Stepsister Scheme draws very loosely on the combined tales of Cinderella, Snow White, and Sleeping Beauty, actually putting these three women (each of them princesses in their own right) together in a fairly standard medieval fantasy world and sending them off on an adventure to rescue Prince Armand, Danielle "Cinderella" Whiteshore's too-recently betrothed. He has been kidnapped by Danielle's still-evil stepsisters, who've mysteriously leveled up with some bad-ass magic powers, and stolen him off to fairyland.

AD&D jokes aside, Hines does not bother trying to reinvent the wheel here: there are magic spells, potions, goblins, trolls, and fairies, and various other standard-issue fantasy trappings in what turns out to be quite a page-turner. It's a fast-paced fantasy adventure that does manage to make all the magical critters and plot twists interesting, and Brandon Sanderson could take a few cues from Jim Hines on how you don't need to write a damn rules manual to make magic interesting and internally consistent while serving the needs of the plot. When the faeries show up, they are also very true to the traditional fairy tales ‐ alternately funny, charming, and deeply dark and creepy ‐ while also being interesting characters in their own right.

Also, while Hines is doing a bit of reinventing, he has done his research — these aren't your crap YA fairy-tale "retellings," there are hints of older and lesser-known tales in Hines's version. (E.g. Talia.)

If you are a fan of Bill Willingham's Fables, then this book may remind you of that series — fairy tale characters who haven't entirely shaken off the glitter of their Disneyfied incarnations (Danielle talks to animals...), yet turn out to be surprisingly real and human characters, who will also cut a bitch.

Does Jim Hines get up on his Social Justice Soapbox and proclaim "LOOK AT MAH STRONG FEMALE CHARACTERS"? Nope. Danielle and Snow and Talia just kick ass 'cause that's what women do. You might get all the way to end of the novel before realizing, "Gee, Prince Armand was a nice guy and all, but he was kind of... insignificant. Just a MacGuffin, really. He didn't actually do anything, he just sat there looking pretty, like a prize waiting to be rescued... hey!"

Short version: it's fun and I enjoyed it a whole lot. I'll definitely check out the next book.

[Poll #1903131]



Verdict: Think of The Stepsister Scheme as a slightly feminist Fables, with traces of Terry Pratchett and Piers Anthony (the non-skeevy traces). It's not doing anything original, but what it does, it does well. A good read if you're in the mood for fun, light fantasy.




My complete list of book reviews.

Date: 2013-03-20 04:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hermione-vader.livejournal.com
This sounds really awesome. I'll have to track this one down. Confession: I'm a feminist who occasionally indulges in Disney movies. I love the music and the nostalgia.

you don't need to write a damn rules manual to make magic interesting and internally consistent while serving the needs of the plot.

Authors should write those for themselves if they need to and keep them in their notebook(s). That way, it stays consistent without overwhelming the readers. Didn't J. K. Rowling do that?

Now part of me wonders if Hines took the name Danielle from Ever After... If so, I love the reference. :)

Date: 2013-03-20 04:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gelsey.livejournal.com
I have always loved his books. I stumbled on the Goblin series of his first, back when it was relatively new, and then this book, and finally his blog, which I love to death. I'm pretty sure I'd take a chance on anything of his (I've also bought his self-done Kindle stories, and enjoyed them). Nice to know you enjoyed them too! I lurk a lot, and enjoy reading your reviews (and more recently, your stories, which I haven't yet had a chance to comment on, but plan on doing eventually :) ).

Date: 2013-03-20 07:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] in_excelsis_dea.livejournal.com
I have been meaning to read this for awhile, but somehow the cover always turned me off (I think because it makes me think of a comic/manga instead of an actual novel?), and the reviews I read never really got me fired up. Now, though, I think I'm going to have to read it. This does look quite good. I have always enjoyed the Disney movies, and I do enjoy retellings, and Once Upon a Time is one of my current obsessions at the moment, so I'm really keyed up for this book now.

Date: 2013-03-20 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kith-koby.livejournal.com
Oh, a very nice review. I've read the entire series, and loved it. Trust me, it gets less Disney-like from here on out, and in a good way.

Date: 2013-03-20 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asulon-bellanca.livejournal.com
Wow, that cover probably scares off a good many readers who would otherwise enjoy the story. If I ever come across it I'll give it a read. I've managed to find a couple you've reviewed at the library. Fables, I've been thinking about giving those a reread, I'm a few books behind now. Thank goodness for sister in laws who collect graphic novels for me to borrow.

ohhhh

Date: 2013-03-21 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mistressdi.livejournal.com
I'm going to read this.

Profile

inverarity: (Default)
inverarity

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678 910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 12:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios