inverarity: (Default)
A Jane Austen fan fiction novelette.


Kergyma in Waltz Time

Twelve Tower Books, 2024, 44 pages



This novelette presents a flat broke, hungry English major whose chief joy in life is story. But the world is not interested in yet one more Jane Austen wannabe. Desperate for a job, she enters a mansion whose ballroom is filled with books.

And then, beyond the virtual veil, she finds an even greater surprise...


Gotta love a heroine who identifies with Charlotte. )

Also by Sherwood Smith: My review of The Phoenix in Flight.




My complete list of book reviews.
inverarity: (Default)
Time Travelers go back in time to meet Jane Austen.


The Jane Austen Project

Harper Perennial, 2017, 384 pages



Perfect for fans of Jane Austen, this engrossing debut novel offers an unusual twist on the legacy of one of the world's most celebrated and beloved authors: Two researchers from the future are sent back in time to meet Jane and recover a suspected unpublished novel.

London, 1815: Two travelers - Rachel Katzman and Liam Finucane - arrive in a field in rural England, disheveled and weighed down with hidden money. Turned away at a nearby inn, they are forced to travel by coach all night to London. They are not what they seem but rather colleagues who have come back in time from a technologically advanced future, posing as wealthy West Indies planters - a doctor and his spinster sister. While Rachel and Liam aren't the first team from the future to "go back", their mission is by far the most audacious: meet, befriend, and steal from Jane Austen herself.

Carefully selected and rigorously trained by The Royal Institute for Special Topics in Physics, disaster-relief doctor Rachel and actor-turned-scholar Liam have little in common besides the extraordinary circumstances they find themselves in. Circumstances that call for Rachel to stifle her independent nature and let Liam take the lead as they infiltrate Austen's circle via her favorite brother, Henry.

But diagnosing Jane's fatal illness and obtaining an unpublished novel hinted at in her letters pose enough of a challenge without the continuous convolutions of living a lie. While her friendship with Jane deepens and her relationship with Liam grows complicated, Rachel fights to reconcile the woman she is with the proper lady 19th-century society expects her to be. As their portal to the future prepares to close, Rachel and Liam struggle with their directive to leave history intact and exactly as they found it...however heartbreaking that may prove.


Like a Jane Austen SF novel, but with little of Austen's wit. )




My complete list of book reviews.
inverarity: (Default)
The Dashwood sisters find husbands, because it's Austen of course.


Sense and Sensibility

Originally published in 1811, 409 pages. Available for free on Project Gutenberg.



Marianne Dashwood wears her heart on her sleeve, and when she falls in love with the dashing but unsuitable John Willoughby she ignores her sister Elinor's warning that her impulsive behaviour leaves her open to gossip and innuendo. Meanwhile Elinor, always sensitive to social convention, is struggling to conceal her own romantic disappointment, even from those closest to her. Through their parallel experience of love-and its threatened loss-the sisters learn that sense must mix with sensibility if they are to find personal happiness in a society where status and money govern the rules of love.


I've finally read ALL the Austens. )

Verdict: Sense and Sensibility has all the virtues of Jane Austen's other five novels, but it was one of her earliest, and the last one I read, which makes it suffer by comparison. No Austen novel is bad, and I enjoyed it, but it's not close to being my favorite. 7/10.

Also by Jane Austen: My reviews of Pride and Prejudice, Northanger Abbey, Mansfield Park, Emma, and Persuasion.




My complete list of book reviews.
inverarity: (inverarity)
The sailor she rejected when he was poor is now rich, and she's unmarried at 27.


Persuasion

Originally published in 1817, 236 pages. Available for free on Project Gutenberg.



Anne Elliot has grieved for seven years over the loss of her first love, Captain Frederick Wentworth. But events conspire to unravel the knots of deceit and misunderstanding in this beguiling and gently comic story of love and fidelity.


Perhaps the most outright romantic of Austen's novels, with torches carried for seven years, and an Austenian heroine married off more happily than the author. )

Verdict: Not my favorite Austen, but not my least favorite either. Austen's prose is as flawless as usual, and Persuasion is finely plotted. It loses points for missing the humor and poignancy I found more abundantly in Austen's other novels. 7/10.

Also by Jane Austen: My reviews of Pride and Prejudice, Northanger Abbey, Mansfield Park, and Emma.




My complete list of book reviews.
inverarity: (inverarity)
Jane Austen's most "unlikable" protagonist, a matchmaking busybody, makes this book more likable and funny than any modern romcom.


Emma

Published in 1815, approximately 160,000 words. Available for free on Project Gutenberg.



Beautiful, clever, rich - and single - Emma Woodhouse is perfectly content with her life and sees no need for either love or marriage. Nothing, however, delights her more than interfering in the romantic lives of others. But when she ignores the warnings of her good friend Mr Knightley and attempts to arrange a suitable match for her protegee Harriet Smith, her carefully laid plans soon unravel and have consequences that she never expected. With its imperfect but charming heroine and its witty and subtle exploration of relationships, Emma is often seen as Jane Austen's most flawless work.


'I am going to take a heroine whom no one but myself will much like.' - plus bonus feature: 6 Netflix reviews! )

Verdict: Now my second-favorite Austen novel (after Pride and Prejudice), Emma is a fine example of a flawed protagonist who grows on you, with a supporting cast of endearing, annoying, and comic characters. While there are mild surprises and genteel plot twists, it's hard to spoil an Austen novel, since if you've read one, you know how they all will end. I remain a fan of her dialog and her character development.

Also by Jane Austen: My reviews of Pride and Prejudice, Northanger Abbey, and Mansfield Park.




My complete list of book reviews.
inverarity: (Default)
This comedy of manners is an ugly duckling story with not quite the sting or wit of Austen's other works.

Mansfield Park

Published in 1814, approximately 160,000 words. Available for free at Project Gutenberg.


Fanny Price, a poor relation of the rich Bertrams, is reluctantly adopted into the family, to be brought up at Mansfield Park, where she is condescendingly treated. Only her cousin, Edmund, a young clergyman, appreciates her fine qualities.

Fanny soon falls in love with him, but Edmund is, unfortunately, drawn to the shallow and worldly Mary Crawford. Fanny's quiet humility, steadfast loyalty, and natural goodness are matched against the wit and brilliance of her lovely rival. The tension is heightened when Henry Crawford, Mary's equally sophisticated and flirtatious brother, takes an interest in Fanny.

Jane Austen's subtle, satiric novel skillfully uses her characters' emotional relationships to explore the social and moral values by which they attempt to order their lives.


Fanny Price was at this time just ten years old, and though there might not be much in her first appearance to captivate, there was, at least, nothing to disgust her relations. )

Verdict: Not my favorite Austen. Mansfield Park is somewhat of a departure from her other books, being as much prudish denouncement of "modern" ways as it is social satire and comedy of manners. The heroine was sweet but a bit on the insipid side, and none of the other characters were particularly memorable. This book is enjoyable enough for Austen fans, but I don't think it's a book that would turn anyone into an Austen fan.

Also by Jane Austen: My reviews of Pride and Prejudice and Northanger Abbey.
inverarity: (Default)
This comedy of manners is an ugly duckling story with not quite the sting or wit of Austen's other works.

Mansfield Park

Published in 1814, approximately 160,000 words. Available for free at Project Gutenberg.


Fanny Price, a poor relation of the rich Bertrams, is reluctantly adopted into the family, to be brought up at Mansfield Park, where she is condescendingly treated. Only her cousin, Edmund, a young clergyman, appreciates her fine qualities.

Fanny soon falls in love with him, but Edmund is, unfortunately, drawn to the shallow and worldly Mary Crawford. Fanny's quiet humility, steadfast loyalty, and natural goodness are matched against the wit and brilliance of her lovely rival. The tension is heightened when Henry Crawford, Mary's equally sophisticated and flirtatious brother, takes an interest in Fanny.

Jane Austen's subtle, satiric novel skillfully uses her characters' emotional relationships to explore the social and moral values by which they attempt to order their lives.


Fanny Price was at this time just ten years old, and though there might not be much in her first appearance to captivate, there was, at least, nothing to disgust her relations. )

Verdict: Not my favorite Austen. Mansfield Park is somewhat of a departure from her other books, being as much prudish denouncement of "modern" ways as it is social satire and comedy of manners. The heroine was sweet but a bit on the insipid side, and none of the other characters were particularly memorable. This book is enjoyable enough for Austen fans, but I don't think it's a book that would turn anyone into an Austen fan.

Also by Jane Austen: My reviews of Pride and Prejudice and Northanger Abbey.
inverarity: (Default)
One-line summary: A young lady with an overactive imagination wishes for gothic adventure, but finds only a husband.

Northanger Abbey

Published in 1818, though Austen wrote it in 1798. Approximately 77,000 words. Available for free at Project Gutenberg.


When Catherine Morland, a country clergyman's daughter, is invited to spend a season in Bath with the fashionable high society, little does she imagine the delights and perils that await her. Captivated and disconcerted by what she finds, and introduced to the joys of "Gothic novels" by her new friend, Isabella, Catherine longs for mystery and romance. When she is invited to stay with the beguiling Henry Tilney and his family at Northanger Abbey, she expects mystery and intrigue at every turn. However, the truth turns out to be even stranger than fiction.


No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland in her infancy would have supposed her born to be an heroine. )

Verdict: I liked this book, but as what amounts to Austen's posthumously-published debut novel, it's not her best. More enjoyable for the satire of literary conventions (and critics) of her day than the rather rushed plot, Northanger Abbey still features a likeable heroine and Austen's prose, the latter of which is enough reason to read it. However, I would not say its quality merits it holding the same place among the classics as Austen's other works, though it is on the list of 1001 books you must read before you die (and has been previously reviewed on the [livejournal.com profile] books1001 comm).

Also by Jane Austen: My review of Pride and Prejudice.
inverarity: (Default)
One-line summary: A young lady with an overactive imagination wishes for gothic adventure, but finds only a husband.

Northanger Abbey

Published in 1818, though Austen wrote it in 1798. Approximately 77,000 words. Available for free at Project Gutenberg.


When Catherine Morland, a country clergyman's daughter, is invited to spend a season in Bath with the fashionable high society, little does she imagine the delights and perils that await her. Captivated and disconcerted by what she finds, and introduced to the joys of "Gothic novels" by her new friend, Isabella, Catherine longs for mystery and romance. When she is invited to stay with the beguiling Henry Tilney and his family at Northanger Abbey, she expects mystery and intrigue at every turn. However, the truth turns out to be even stranger than fiction.


No one who had ever seen Catherine Morland in her infancy would have supposed her born to be an heroine. )

Verdict: I liked this book, but as what amounts to Austen's posthumously-published debut novel, it's not her best. More enjoyable for the satire of literary conventions (and critics) of her day than the rather rushed plot, Northanger Abbey still features a likeable heroine and Austen's prose, the latter of which is enough reason to read it. However, I would not say its quality merits it holding the same place among the classics as Austen's other works, though it is on the list of 1001 books you must read before you die (and has been previously reviewed on the [livejournal.com profile] books1001 comm).

Also by Jane Austen: My review of Pride and Prejudice.
inverarity: (Default)
One-line summary: Boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy finds girl again. C'mon, it's Jane Austen!



Reviews:

Goodreads: Average: 4.23. Mode: 5 stars (53%)
Amazon: Average: 4.5. Mode: 5 stars (74%)


"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife."

So begins Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen's witty comedy of manners--one of the most popular novels of all time--that features splendidly civilized sparring between the proud Mr. Darcy and the prejudiced Elizabeth Bennet as they play out their spirited courtship in a series of eighteenth-century drawing-room intrigues. Renowned literary critic and historian George Saintsbury in 1894 declared it the "most perfect, the most characteristic, the most eminently quintessential of its author's works," and Eudora Welty in the twentieth century described it as "irresistible and as nearly flawless as any fiction could be."


When I asked people to recommend me a classic, Pride and Prejudice was by far the most recommended choice. (By the way, I actually ended up downloading most of them.)

So I'm probably the last person in the world to read Pride and Prejudice, right? What am I going to say in a review that hasn't been said already a million times in the last two hundred years? How ever can I make a review of Pride and Prejudice remotely interesting or new?

Well, I probably can't, but I can sure write a lot when I'm enthusiastic. Below the cut, much text ensues.

Whereupon the reviewer becomes an Austen fanboy. Readers without a jaded sensibility and an extraordinary tolerance for teal dear are advised to venture no further. )

Verdict: Okay, I can understand why Austen's hyper-elegant romcom about 19th century English gentry might put off those who aren't fans of the genre. But once I got used to the style, I loved Austen's finely-crafted prose. It's a work of genius: even if the story is not your cup of tea, you should appreciate how perfectly the plot is constructed and the nuances of characterization.

Austen on Netflix Bonus Feature



So, after reading (listening to, actually) the book, I decided to go back and watch the film version again. Oh, wait -- which one? There are four versions available on Netflix. (Not counting the Bollywood version, the Mormon version, and the AU fanfic version.)

So, I watched all of them. In a row.

Yes, I know this is bookish, so skip the cut if you don't want a comparative review of 65 years of Pride and Prejudice on film.

A Pride and Prejudice marathon )
inverarity: (Default)
One-line summary: Boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy finds girl again. C'mon, it's Jane Austen!



Reviews:

Goodreads: Average: 4.23. Mode: 5 stars (53%)
Amazon: Average: 4.5. Mode: 5 stars (74%)


"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife."

So begins Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen's witty comedy of manners--one of the most popular novels of all time--that features splendidly civilized sparring between the proud Mr. Darcy and the prejudiced Elizabeth Bennet as they play out their spirited courtship in a series of eighteenth-century drawing-room intrigues. Renowned literary critic and historian George Saintsbury in 1894 declared it the "most perfect, the most characteristic, the most eminently quintessential of its author's works," and Eudora Welty in the twentieth century described it as "irresistible and as nearly flawless as any fiction could be."


When I asked people to recommend me a classic, Pride and Prejudice was by far the most recommended choice. (By the way, I actually ended up downloading most of them.)

So I'm probably the last person in the world to read Pride and Prejudice, right? What am I going to say in a review that hasn't been said already a million times in the last two hundred years? How ever can I make a review of Pride and Prejudice remotely interesting or new?

Well, I probably can't, but I can sure write a lot when I'm enthusiastic. Below the cut, much text ensues.

Whereupon the reviewer becomes an Austen fanboy. Readers without a jaded sensibility and an extraordinary tolerance for teal dear are advised to venture no further. )

Verdict: Okay, I can understand why Austen's hyper-elegant romcom about 19th century English gentry might put off those who aren't fans of the genre. But once I got used to the style, I loved Austen's finely-crafted prose. It's a work of genius: even if the story is not your cup of tea, you should appreciate how perfectly the plot is constructed and the nuances of characterization.

Austen on Netflix Bonus Feature



So, after reading (listening to, actually) the book, I decided to go back and watch the film version again. Oh, wait -- which one? There are four versions available on Netflix. (Not counting the Bollywood version, the Mormon version, and the AU fanfic version.)

So, I watched all of them. In a row.

Yes, I know this is bookish, so skip the cut if you don't want a comparative review of 65 years of Pride and Prejudice on film.

A Pride and Prejudice marathon )

Profile

inverarity: (Default)
inverarity

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678 910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 07:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios